Where on Earth did they find that sensor? 2004?! In most of the wide shots, this _camera_ has worse IQ than my _smartphone_ in broad daylight. Certainly not under magic hour!Īm I going mad? All the comments here are really positive, but to my eyes, this looks dreadful. Shooting from a long distance, just makes it worse. The data provided does not show what time the photo was taken, but there appears to be a lot of mid-afternoon atmospheric haze.
The glacier closeup at 2,000mm (Dan_06) suffers from over-exposure, easily corrected with the +2 to -2EV exposure compensation. Looking at the racoon image under direct sunlight, you see much better sharpness and detail. Yes, you don't have great feather detail, but the DOF is very shallow. I found the owl closeup pretty decent, considering it was taken in the shade in low light conditions. It's the old adage of you get what you pay for!īut let's look at the gallery images more critically and thoughtfully. Part 1: For its features, zoom range and price category of under $600, I think this is a great camera! Does it have the sharpness of a Nikon D800 with a 500mm f/4 Nikkor lens? Of course not! The latter system, which I own, is a $10,000 investment.
0 kommentar(er)
